ទិន្នន័យបន្ថែមរបស់អត្ថបទត្រូវបានសង្ខេប និងផ្ទៀងផ្ទាត់នឹងតារាងរបស់វា

អ្វីដែលនិស្សិតបានវាយ

I'm replicating the PM2.5 paper attached (PLOS ONE 2025). S1_File_data_for_Fig5.xlsx has the local MGWR results for 337 cities on sheet 'PM2.5_socioeconomic' (beta_, se_, t_ and p_ columns for Popden, PGDP, Prosec, Energy, Roadden, NDVI).

In this workbook, add a sheet 'Summary' with one row per factor and these columns:
1. Mean, SD (sample), Min, Median, Max of the beta_ coefficient
2. Number of cities with p < 0.05 (use the p_ column), split into positive and negative beta
3. The mean reported in the paper's Table 6 (PDF page 13), and the difference from our mean

Use formulas pointing at the data sheet where you can. Then add a native Excel bar chart of the six mean coefficients on the Summary sheet. Leave the data sheet unchanged.

អ្វីដែលនិស្សិតបានវាយ

Now add the natural factors. In the same workbook:

1. Copy sheet 'PM2.5_natural' from S2_File_data_for_Fig6.xlsx (attached) in as a second data sheet, unchanged.
2. Extend the Summary to all 12 factors (Tem, Pre, Ws, Rh, Ap, Sd below the six socioeconomic ones), same columns, including the Table 6 means.
3. Change the chart to a horizontal bar chart of all 12 means, sorted from largest to smallest, with socioeconomic and natural factors in two different colours and a legend saying which is which.

Don't change the existing six Summary rows.

អ្វីដែលនិស្សិតបានវាយ ដោយភ្ជាប់អត្ថបទម្តងទៀត

The Table 6 means for Tem, Pre, Ws, Rh, Ap and Sd are still missing in the Summary. They are in Table 6 on page 13 of the paper attached. Please fill them in, with the difference from our mean, like the six socioeconomic rows.